Food For Thought: What Legal Issues May Impact Your Social Media Activities?

The Internet is transforming the way in which companies communicate with customers. That transformation is accelerating at an astonishing pace as a result of social networking sites, such as Facebook®, Twitter® and blogs. More than ever consumers are sharing their experiences and opinions, good and bad, with global audiences on blogs, social networks and consumer review sites at the touch of a button. Those opinions have the potential for shaping, controlling and redefining advertising messages, not to mention companies’ reputations. Many companies are still unaware of the benefits of social media marketing. While others have been caught off guard and unable to adapt to the speed at which social media marketing is revolutionizing the way in which companies communicate with customers and potential customers and the way in which consumers are voicing their opinions about companies and their products.

The ever-increasing number of social networking sites is making it difficult, if not seemingly impossible, for companies to adequately manage their advertising message, reputation, intellectual property assets and legal risks. That difficulty will undoubtedly intensify as the number of participants of user-generated content sites explodes to an estimated one billion by 2012. It is estimated that there will be thirty to forty billion “tweets” by the end of 2010. Clearly, the pace at which people are using social media networks to connect with friends and seek out online relationships with business is exploding, which is why some companies see social media as an opportunity to connect with consumers that they could not otherwise reach with traditional marketing efforts.

The question being asked by social media experts is whether companies that have not already done so will embrace this potentially golden opportunity to reach tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of traditionally unattainable consumers with the strike of a computer key or be immobilized by fear. The trepidation surrounding social media marketing stems from companies not understanding its intricacies and their concerns over legal ramifications for doing so.

Company concerns include losing control of the branding message, return on time investment, costs, posting of negative comments or feedback by customers, employees and ex-employees, defamation liability, vicarious liability, losing control of copyrighted materials, unauthorized use of their copyrights and trademarks, employees engaging in copyright and trademark infringements and other illegal activities, employment law issues, loss of trade secrets and proprietary information, violations of certain state and federal laws and regulations, including Federal Trade Commission laws, and potential litigation impact. To minimize those legal risks, companies should develop social media policies that reflect corporate culture, take into account a company’s brand and risk tolerance.

An important aspect of a social media policy is minimizing the risks associated with brand and trademark hijacking, trademark and copyright infringement and damage to brand reputation. Those policies should include reserving company names and key permutations of company names with social networking sites, developing a presence in social networking communities, assigning key employees to handle social media activities, developing a monitoring and enforcement process and understanding the terms of use for each of the major social networks. Social media policies should also include a consistent enforcement program for handling misuse of company brands, trademarks and copyrights and for handling other damaging activities of third parties, including trade libel. The policies should also set forth guidelines for employee conduct in social media environments, including guidelines for minimizing the risks of harassing and defamatory conduct. Developing of an enforcement program and committing to systematically monitoring for potentially damaging activities can go a long way toward making sure that online social networking sites remain free of content that is damaging to company brands, reputation and intellectual property.

Time To Revisit The Federal Trade Commission’s Updated Guidelines For Product Endorsements: Bloggers (Including Micro-Bloggers) Beware

Over the past month or so, I’ve been asked by three bloggers whether they’re subject to the “new” FTC guidelines (released in 2009) concerning product and service endorsements. Each of those bloggers do – from time to time – accept “freebies” (either free products or services) in exchange for writing about those products/services on their respective blogs. I too receive those offers, but have yet to accept.

Given those recent inquiries, and the potential for bloggers to land in the crosshairs of a FTC false and deceptive advertising claim, I thought it was time to re-visit this issue and remind bloggers of the FTC guidelines regarding advertising and product/service endorsements.

Last year the FTC updated its Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising Guidelines (the “Guidelines”). Those Guidelines now expressly include advertising and endorsements made through social media, including podcasts, social media networks and blogs. The Guidelines are not new. They have simply been updated to keep pace with technological changes in media.

If you’re a blogger that’s paid to endorse/promote certain products or services -– or you simply receive freebies in exchange for blogging about them — then the Guidelines apply to you. The reason is simple. When there exists a connection between an endorser (i.e., a blogger) and the seller of the endorsed product/service that might materially affect the weight or credibility of the endorsement (i.e., the connection is not reasonably expected by the audience), such connection must be fully disclosed.

Some of the things you need to know about the Guidelines are:

1. If there is a relationship between you and a product or service provider, i.e., you are being paid to give — or you receive freebies in exchange for — a blog review or endorsement (a “Relationship”), you must disclose that Relationship.

2. Blogger endorsements must reflect the honest opinions, findings, beliefs, or experience of the endorser.

3. Don’t make false claims or claims that cannot be substantiated as a “typical result.”

4. Blogger endorsements may not convey any express or implied representations that would be deceptive if made directly by the advertiser/product manufacturer.

5. Disclosure of a Relationship still applies to micro blogging via Twitter. Simply use the “#paid_ad” hash tag or something similar. It’s only 8 characters.

6. You can’t talk about your experience if you haven’t tried the endorsed product or service.

7. If you tried the product or service and didn’t think it was “great!” — you can’t say you think it’s great! That’s simply deceptive advertising and in violation of advertising laws. Why deceive loyal followers?

8. Advertisers/product manufacturers are subject to liability for false or unsubstantiated statements made by blogger endorsers.

9. Failure of bloggers to disclose Relationships may result in the bloggers themselves becoming liable for deceptive advertising practices for statements made in the course of their endorsements.

10. Bloggers that make false or unsubstantiated claims about a product or service may be liable for deceptive advertising practices.

An example:

A skin care products advertiser participates in a blog advertising service. The service matches up advertisers with bloggers who will promote the advertiser’s products on their personal blogs. The advertiser requests that a blogger try a new body lotion and write a review of the product on her blog. Although the advertiser does not make any specific claims about the lotion’s ability to cure skin conditions and the blogger does not ask the advertiser whether there is substantiation for the claim, in her review the blogger writes that the lotion cures eczema and recommends the product to her blog readers who suffer from this condition. 

The advertiser is subject to liability for misleading or unsubstantiated representations made through the bloggers endorsements. The blogger also is subject to liability for misleading or unsubstantiated representations made in the course of her endorsement. The blogger is also liable if she fails to disclose clearly and conspicuously that she is being paid for her services.

The next time you receive a “tweet” that looks, smells and tastes like an endorsement, it probably is. And if so, that endorser should take notice of the FTC’s laws regulating advertising and endorsements.

For more information about the Guidelines, visit the FTC’s website.