Beware: Trademark Office Scams Alert

Trademark Office Scams Alert

Introduction

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) continues to battle trademark Office scams involving application and registration scams and fraud. The USPTO investigates possible scams involving suspected fraud and unauthorized practice of law. These investigations include solicitations from so-called IP “experts” offering services to trademark owners. The USPTO also battles other fraudulent activities, including “faked specimens of use” created solely for securing US trademark registrations.

USPTO Recently Cancels Thousands of Trademark Applications

and Registrations Based on Fraudulent Filings

Summary Overview – Trademark Office Scams Alert

As reported earlier this year, the USPTO identified many trademark application assistance companies employing fraudulent activities. As a result, they were barred from practicing before the USPTO. The USPTO also cancelled their customers’ trademark filings based on those activities. The USPTO’s final order outlines the fraudulent activities, including the following:

Respondents’ submission of thousands of trademark documents containing false representations of fact upon which the USPTO relied in determining entitlement to registration was both willful and fraudulent.

Respondents would solicit parties interested in applying for a trademark registration by touting falsely low fees and timeframes to obtain registration, or would use deceptive practices to coerce their logo design customers into allowing them to file U.S. trademark applications on their customers’ behalf. In certain cases, Respondents would send customers false, yet official-looking letters, bearing the actual seal of the USPTO, threatening customers with legal action if they failed to register their logos with the USPTO within a particular time period. These fake demand letters, misappropriating the USPTO name, logo, and seal, scared customers into paying for unnecessary services that Respondents were not even permitted to undertake because Respondents are not a law firm, nor do they employ licensed attorneys to prosecute U.S. trademark applications.

Respondents provided customers who hired Respondents to file trademark applications with falsified application filing receipts and invoices for inflated fees. Respondents charged customers filing fees for multiple classes of goods and services while, in reality, Respondents only paid the USPTO for single-class applications, often including a different identification of goods or services than those agreed-to by the applicant.

BEWARE: They are likely still operating under other company names and websites and, if not, they will be back!

Trademark Office scams
What’s the Potential Impact to Trademark Owners that Used these Companies?

Trademark owners lost valuable trademark and trademark application rights when their trademark filings were cancelled. Therefore, by forfeiting trademark application filing priority dates, certain of these brand owners may be forced to rebrand and start the entire naming process over. Accordingly, trademark owners impacted by these events should take certain steps, including ensuring that their trademark use rights were not impacted and re-filing their trademark applications.

Why Use Low-Cost Online Trademark Application Services?

A main attraction for using these online trademark filing platforms is likely low costs. However, as with most everything in life, cost is but one factor to consider. For example, when you’re buying a new car, cost is obviously an important factor. However, there are other factors to consider as well such as quality, safety, and total cost to own. When it comes to legal services, balancing costs with quality and experience should also be considered.

As we all know, “If it’s too good to be true, it probably is” and sometimes “You get what you pay for.”

Actions to Take if Your Trademark Filing was Terminated Based on this Ruling

1. Confirm your application was terminated. If you worked with any of the identified entities (see link below), the USPTO should have emailed notices of termination to the correspondence email address of record. Unfortunately, however, for most that email was likely sent to the scammers and not the trademark owners.

If you did not receive the notice, check the status of your application in the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system to confirm that your application was terminated. If it was terminated, prompt action is warranted.

2. File a new application and conduct a new trademark search. If your application was terminated, you should file a new application immediately and undertake a trademark search to ensure that there are no intervening trademark applications or uses that may block your new application or impact your ability to use your selected trademark.

Listen to our podcasts here and here to learn more about trademark searches and the trademark registration process.

3. File a Petition with the Director. If you can establish that the violations do not apply to your terminated application(s), you may file a Petition to the Director and request that your application(s) be reinstated because of error.

Trademark Office scams
           U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

 

How to Avoid Trademark Office Scams and Pitfalls – A Few Considerations

1. Know who you are doing business with. Review the attorney biographies to ensure they are experienced trademark attorneys. If you cannot identify any of the attorneys from the company website… or any of its principals… that might be warning number 1…

2. Talk with them for a few minutes to see if they are confident in their trade and skills and can speak clearly and confidently about the rules, regulations and strategies for trademark use and registration.

3. And perhaps most importantly, hire “trademark attorneys” and not “attorneys that do trademarks.”

To see the full list of companies implicated by the USPTO decision, click here.

To read the full USPTO final order, click here.

 

New USPTO Trademark “Specimens of Use” Examination Guide Issues

New U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Guideline Issues: Guide 3-19

Trademark “Specimens of Use” Examination Guide Updated

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) issues new guidelines for acceptable specimens of use. Specifically, the guidelines focus on “Digitally Created/Altered or Mockup Specimens.” Furthermore, the new guidelines guard against growing fraudulent trademark activity before the USPTO.

“Trademark Use” – A Prerequisite for U.S. Trademark Registration (with exception)

U.S trademark law requires that a trademark be put to genuine use before a U.S. trademark registration can issue. Furthermore, to show genuine use, an applicant must provide a specimen use (or an example of how the mark is used).

    • To learn more about acceptable specimens of use, click here.

However, an exception to that rule is if a U.S. trademark application filing basis corresponds to a foreign trademark registration.

Trademark “Specimens of Use” Examination
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Massive “Specimen of Use” Fraud on USPTO Causes Alarm and Action

In recent years, a massive wave of fraudulent trademark filings has flooded the USPTO from China. For instance, the applicants file fraudulent use affidavits and faked specimens of use to secure registration without actually using the mark. Also, it’s quite striking that the Chinese government may fund those filings, based on various reports.

Legitimate Brand Owners Suffer Consequences of Colossal Fraud on USPTO

The massive assault of these fraudulent filings causes legitimate brand owners to suffer the consequences. For example, the consequences include the refusal of applications based upon likelihood of confusion with marks in fraudulent filings, an increase in costs and not securing registration.

USPTO Takes Aggressive Actions to Combat Fraud 

To combat the onslaught of those fraudulent filings, the USPTO has issued new strict rules governing trademark application filings. Those rules include the requirements of listing applicant’s physical address, using a U.S.-licensed attorney and meticulously reviewing specimens of use.

Good News for the Long Run?

We are pleased that the USPTO is now “locked and loaded” to snuff out the fakes and clear the register. However, it will be a long haul to clear the thousands of fraudulent trademark registrations.

The good news is that a registrant must file a use affidavit between the 5th and 6th of and every ten years from registration to maintain a trademark registration.

However, with new technologies creating ever so life-like fakes and with fraudsters finding new ways to beat the system, we can at least remain hopeful.

trademark “Specimens of Use” Examination